What are the 10 most credited POSTS in the history of xoxo?
| mildly autistic saffron lettuce parlor | 04/27/11 | | spectacular address stock car | 04/27/11 | | pontificating translucent jew | 04/27/11 | | brass boistinker | 04/27/11 | | mildly autistic saffron lettuce parlor | 04/27/11 | | pontificating translucent jew | 04/27/11 | | mildly autistic saffron lettuce parlor | 04/27/11 | | pontificating translucent jew | 04/27/11 | | cream house friendly grandma | 04/27/11 | | Buff Titillating New Version | 04/27/11 | | hilarious location | 04/27/11 | | brass boistinker | 04/27/11 | | hilarious location | 04/27/11 | | sepia brunch | 04/27/11 | | brass boistinker | 04/27/11 | | hilarious location | 04/27/11 | | soul-stirring lime property | 10/20/11 | | bossy tan spot philosopher-king | 10/20/11 | | brass boistinker | 04/27/11 | | galvanic personal credit line public bath | 04/27/11 | | sepia brunch | 04/27/11 | | at-the-ready really tough guy business firm | 04/27/11 | | multi-colored copper base | 11/02/11 | | Electric meetinghouse | 04/27/11 | | galvanic personal credit line public bath | 04/27/11 | | cerebral onyx cuckoldry den | 10/20/11 | | big queen of the night | 04/27/11 | | Citrine Legal Warrant Old Irish Cottage | 04/27/11 | | hilarious location | 04/27/11 | | painfully honest foreskin stag film | 11/02/11 | | hilarious location | 04/27/11 | | painfully honest foreskin stag film | 04/27/11 | | Lemon Provocative Roommate Striped Hyena | 04/27/11 | | hilarious location | 04/27/11 | | Citrine Legal Warrant Old Irish Cottage | 04/27/11 | | multi-colored copper base | 04/27/11 | | Citrine Legal Warrant Old Irish Cottage | 04/27/11 | | floppy garrison mediation | 10/21/11 | | very tactful chrome principal's office | 04/27/11 | | galvanic personal credit line public bath | 10/21/11 | | floppy garrison mediation | 10/21/11 | | Aquamarine hell messiness | 10/20/11 | | Ruddy mad-dog skullcap | 10/20/11 | | Adventurous Genital Piercing | 10/20/11 | | Mahogany idiotic pisswyrm corner | 10/20/11 | | 180 black fanboi turdskin | 10/21/11 | | dashing nursing home | 10/21/11 | | azure mood stage | 10/21/11 | | Tripping Multi-billionaire Hominid | 11/03/11 | | floppy garrison mediation | 10/21/11 | | Marvelous Mauve Preventive Strike Area | 10/21/11 | | Marvelous Mauve Preventive Strike Area | 11/02/11 | | dun gaped filthpig | 11/02/11 | | Marvelous Mauve Preventive Strike Area | 11/02/11 | | bipolar green institution | 10/21/11 | | Razzmatazz silver telephone bbw | 10/21/11 | | Boyish Crawly Point | 10/21/11 | | Odious obsidian sweet tailpipe | 10/21/11 | | beady-eyed cuckold | 10/21/11 | | Swashbuckling ebony jewess | 11/02/11 | | painfully honest foreskin stag film | 11/02/11 | | shivering heady sound barrier center | 11/02/11 | | Bespoke chapel | 11/02/11 | | massive gunner theatre | 11/03/11 | | misunderstood henna menage internal respiration | 11/03/11 |
 Poast new message in this thread
   
Date: April 27th, 2011 6:25 PM
Author: at-the-ready really tough guy business firm
Os S&C shoulderbag an xo original?Fiver should be on there, for perhaps the last substantive contribution.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1630519&forum_id=2#17868891) |
 |
Date: November 2nd, 2011 3:52 PM
Author: multi-colored copper base
Based on your reaction to getting the offer, this is probably the best thing that could have ever happened to you. I encourage you to enjoy the summer and take accept their offer as nothing in the world will cure you of your prestige obsession quicker than some time at S&C.During orientation, they'll give you an S&C shoulderbag and you'll wear it with the S&C logo facing outward so any other commuters in the know can see it and you'll just know that they're either impressed or envious. And that will make you happy and proud. And then you'll try to figure out the best way to ensure that you're sworn in as soon as possible after receiving your bar results because then you'll get the box full of business cards that say "Sullivan & Cromwell LLP" with your actual name underneath. You'll be giddy at the thought of casually passing one (mid-conversation) to some acquaintance from undergrad you've lost touch with. You'll start working and you'll notice that there are an awful lot of "Farewell" emails and someone will tell you that the farewell emails can only contain 4 names at a time per firm policy because the partners decided sometime in 2004 that emails indicating 6 or 7 people were leaving the firm in a two week period might cause some unhelpful whispering. You'll talk to a midlevel associate who is super-psyched to work at S&C and you'll find out that he (not a lot of shes) lateralled from some firm that frankly you would never have considered working for (too TTT for you). When you get back to your office, this will trouble you a bit, you'll wonder if your own escutcheon is being blemished by the presence of this type of person (i.e., non-elite) at your S&C. But that feeling will pass as you'll find plenty of other like-minded first years who equally relish the prestige as you you head for a drink at Ulysses (shoulderbag logo facing outward). Then you'll get staffed on your first big deal and you'll work late night after late night and then on the weekend and on to the next weekend and then on to the weekend when you had planned to go to a friend's wedding. And you won't go because the work has to get done and you have dues to pay (or so you'll be told). You'll get a little bit upset about this turn of events, but the arrival of those business cards will soften the blow. You'll meet more and more laterals from firms that you would never work for (some you've never even heard of). You'll note in the farewell emails that some of the junior and midlevel associates leaving S&C are going to those very same firms. Survival of the fittest you'll say. But late at night, when the air conditioning clicks down from a barely perceptible hissing sound to complete silence, these things will bother you. But you'll tell yourself you're just tired and frustrated and anyway you have work to do. You'll have lunch with Rodge and he'll tell you that business is good and that he's listening to associates' concerns about quality of life issues. You'll notice that some of the senior associates visibly roll their eyes at each other when this comes up, but you won't mind that much because, really, what other firm's managing partner regulalry has lunch with associates to hear their concerns (and takes notes!) A few months will pass, a few marathon deals will happen, you'll have to re-schedule a vacation but you'll tell yourself that that is to be expected. About a year in, a couple of your classmates will crack and start talking about how much the job sucks. They'll very likely have gone to Yale Law School. You'll joke that they couldn't hack it when they leave the firm for a clerkship, or an academic position or to go to a firm in another city. Things will go on in this pattern and you'll notice the fact that you're working a lot harder than your friends who went to "peer" firms. At first you'll be proud of this and brag about it, but after a while you'll find yourself downplaying it. At least when you have the time to get out and socialize with your law school friends. Something will happen: a partner will scream at you, a senior associate gunning for partner will blame you for her mistake, the partner will tell you that the trip to Europe your spouse meticulously planned just won't be able to happen (he'll be really sorry and will tell you a funny story about the exotic vacation he missed or cut short). Doesn't matter what, but you'll get really pissed and you'll start to take some of the 4 or 5 calls from headhunters that you'll receive every day at that point (vultures spell blood). They'll give you the names of firms that you laughed on in the days when you posted on the XOXO board, but you'll find yourself looking into them. The headhunter will encourage to just listen to their offer and you'll consider doing so. But you won't leave because then you'd have to give up your business cards. And stop wearing the shoulder bag. And the bonus is only x months away so you'll start thinking about it then. Until one day you won't be able to take it any more and you'll find yourself arranging to meet with people from a lightly regarded firm for a position in their New York office. And you'll worry that the XOXO crowd will see you. And you don't believe any of this will happen, but I suggest you print this out and keep it in the top desk of your drawer so late at night when you're feeling sorry for yourself, you can add to the list of reasons to be miserable this fact: someone told you this was going to happen and you thought that person was crazy.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1630519&forum_id=2#19286945) |
Date: April 27th, 2011 7:28 PM
Author: Citrine Legal Warrant Old Irish Cottage
zelda dungeon postwhokebe baptism edit: and of course renada on uchicago, did no one say it yet?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1630519&forum_id=2#17869379) |
Date: October 20th, 2011 10:56 PM
Author: Aquamarine hell messiness
Who is Theodore Huang?renada's Chicago post double stitched by hand the original REVERSEPWNBIGWILLIESTYLE when Barzini realized he had to plug in an external hard drive
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1630519&forum_id=2#19212600) |
Date: October 21st, 2011 7:11 AM
Author: floppy garrison mediation
Date: August 21st, 2011 8:22 PMAuthor: Jimmy Pop For the first week you'll be like "Man, this sucks. Can't believe I'm wiping her ass every day." Then the second week you'll be like "Hey, this isn't so bad." Third week you'll bend down to get a lot closer, kind of liking the smell and the sight. Fourth week you're serving her a lot of Mexican, so she has to go to the bathroom a lot, and you're right in there, face up close and sniffing her ass and pussy and telling her that you bought special toilet paper that is so light it will feel like you're wiping her ass with your hand. Fifth week it's like Misery and you get a sledgehammer to keep both her arms broken. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1738232&forum_id=2#18804853)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1630519&forum_id=2#19214180) |
Date: October 21st, 2011 1:14 PM
Author: Marvelous Mauve Preventive Strike Area
http://randazza.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/autoadmitcom-notice-to-yls-faculty-concerning-heide-iravani.pdfDate: March 9th, 2007 2:03 PM Author: lonelyvirgin This e-mail will be dispatched to the entire YLS faculty within the next five minutes. I've assembled a spreadsheet with their addresses and every single one of them will be notified about what our darling little Heide has done. I post this here as a warning to all those who would try to regulate the more antisocial posters- we have the power now. ----------------------- Dear Yale Law faculty, I write to you now about a very important issue that affects a non-trivial number of you. Although you undoubtedly deal with self-entitled, spoiled students on a regular basis, there�s one person in particular whose history I feel you must be made aware of before problems arise. Heide Iravani, a student in your 09 class, has a felon as a father who stole money from the World Bank to buy her horses. I kid you not, she asked her father for horses so he took money from an organization aimed at helping the poor. Just imagine how hard she must have begged him in order to commit such an odious crime. One could make the argument that her character at ten is not representative of her values as an adult, if it wasn�t for the recent evidence to the contrary. She spent in excess of $150 to remove material that was in the public domain, simply because she found it offensive that it emphasized her good looks. If such reckless use of money in the name of free speech suppression is not indicative of a damaged character, I don�t know what it is. Best of luck to you in managing this liability, it is regretful that the admissions process can�t encapsulate the entire person. XOXO HTH Patrick Bateman (Harvard Law School 08) References: http://www.unc.edu/news/archives/apr04/udall042604.html http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-915261.html http://abcnews.go.com/US/print?id=2912364 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=592608&forum_id=2#7729592)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1630519&forum_id=2#19215405) |
|
Date: November 2nd, 2011 1:39 PM
Author: Marvelous Mauve Preventive Strike Area
Date: June 19th, 2007 7:05 PMAuthor: lonelyvirgin Dear Yale Law faculty, As you may or may not be aware, there is a lawsuit underway whose plaintiffs (represented by the epitome of kikes, David Rosen) are two of your students. Here is a copy of their claims: http:llonline.wsj.codpubiclresources/documenta~omplaiut.p To be fair to the posters whose identities are going to be exposed, these are the names of the plantiffs: Doe I = 'Brittan Heller', Doe II = 'Heide Iravani'. If you can't put a face to those names, just remember: Brittan Heller is barely capable of reading (159 LSAT) and Heide Iravani ...well, she has big fake titties. Should you take a look at the claims, you'll see this is an obvious case of people getting bent out of shape because free speech sometimes hurts. Why your colleagues thought this was worthy of wasting everyone's time is beyond me. My own pet theory is that Mr. Rosen has recently found two talented knob gobblers to take care of business for him, in exchange for "pro bono" work. I can't blame him for trying to exploit their predicament, but it seems like the risk of contracting herpes from Brittan Heller would convince any rational person to go to a prostitute first. As for Heide Iravani, who wants that litigious cunt holding a sexual harassment lawsuit over their head? I encourage you all to speak out against your intemperate colleagues who are trying to destroy fellow members of the legal community. Sincerely, The same d00d who wrote the first Heide Iravani e-mail P.S.- To Mr. Rosen and his feministldyke allies-don't bother trying to find out who wrote this e-mail. As much as you like to think people can be held accountable for what they say, this is not the reality on the internet. I did get some serious lulz thinking about what type of claims you'd include in a lawsuit against me. Alas, three layers of anonymous proxies and a wireless access point ensure this suit will remain within the realm of fantasy land. Good thing too, because god knows I don't want to cut back on models and bottles.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1630519&forum_id=2#19286150) |
|
Date: November 2nd, 2011 4:47 PM
Author: Marvelous Mauve Preventive Strike Area
and the AK47 letter was still to come...I've been advised to protect myself from Brittan Heller, Heide Iravani, and their cadre of elite lawyers by using the Internet. Thus, I am currently in the process of creating a website that I will use to track the litigation, step by step, until its resolution. The website wil detail all the allegations and allegedly harmful comments in the case, and will feature the actual names of Brittan Heller and Heide Iravani as well as information pertaining to why they are suing me, and so on. Since none of the allegations, accusations, or allegedly harmful comments have been tested yet in court or otherwise proven false, I will ask for comments on whether such allegedly harmful comments are true or have any merit. The website will be publicly viewable, obviously, and in order to reach a maximally large audience, I will send a link to Yale students as well as other university students. A link to the site will also be posted on Autoadmit.com, the site that stared this whole mess. A mirror site will be created, too, as is customary when a site achieves too much traffic. (Autoadmit's mirror site is Xoxohth.com.) A blog will also be established for the site. As any person familiar with the operation and creation of web sites will attest, blogs are very easy to create and maintain, and there are hundreds of free blog providers and free website providers for persons interested in airing their views to the public. Two obvious provides are Google, which provides GooglePages (which, incidentally, is where certain posters attacked Brittan Heller and Heide Iravani on the "T14 contest" site, which led Brittan Heller and Heide Iravani to fie this suit - note that the website I intend to create will not intentionally disparage Brittan Heller and Heide Iravani in any way, but wil rather ask the public for comment into whether any of the comments posted by the anonymous defendants are true or have any merit, as well as accept general comments and opinions of the girls from classmates, friends, and other observers in an effort to build any possible defense to Brittan Heller and Heide Iravani, and blogger.com, which provides a free blog-creation service. Again, I was not involved in any way with the websites or emails created or sent by the anonymous defendants. Creating and managing the site is well within my First Amendment rights. Any action to silence, harass or coerce me into taking the site down will be met by an appropriate anti-SLAPP motion which, as I'm sure you know, protects speakers from "strategic" suits designed to silence criticism and/or public speech. The protections provided by the anti-SLAPP laws are especially strong where the speech pertains to a matter currently under review in a judicial proceeding, and thus applies to speech pertaining to suit brought by Heide Iravani and Brittan Heller. Such a motion also entitles me to attorney's fees incured in the process. An anti-SLAPP suit may also be pursued to recover attorney's fees already incurred as a result of this suit. As you know, Connecticut doesn't currently have Anti-SLAPP legislation, but Californa - i.e., where the Subpoena was executed does, as do many other states. To date, this horrible case has cost me several thousand dollars in legal fees and related costs. My intent is not to further harm Brittan Heller and Heide Iravani. As I stated above, I recognize that these women have experienced some emotional difficulty as a result of their lives being publicly scrutinized and criticized on Autoadmit.com and other websites. However, if I am going to be sued by these young women for making a frivolous, non-threatening, nonactionable, innocuous and constitutionally protected comment on a website -- i.e., "Women named Jill and Heide should be raped," then I think it fair to create a site that details all the claims put fort against me and my co-defendants. I have no way of knowing whether the anonymous defendants' comments concerning Heide's criminality and sexual deviancy are accurate, and a site that details all the allegations and accepts comments from persons that know Brittan Heller or Heide Iravani would be a good place to examine those comments. There is also another reason for the site. Since Brittan Heller and Heide Iravani's suit puts forth all sorts of extraordinary claims, and since I have no idea whether Brittan Heller and Heide Iravani are as sexually loose or bigoted as the anonymous Defendants' claimed on the site, I wil need evidence to support a "truth" defense to Brittan Heller and Heide Iravani's allegations. And since, apparently, it is extraordinarily easy to obtain a subpoena, I will be pursuing the following subpoenas (note that one or more of the following items can easily be obtained through an alternative discovery tool): 1) A subpoena for information pertaining to the size of Heide Iravani's breasts and whether such breasts, as alleged by one Defendant, are "fake" 2) Information pertaining to whether Brittan Heller or Heide Iravani are indeed "universally hated" by their peers 3) Information pertaining to whether Brittan Heller or Heide Iravani have any sexually transmitted diseases, including Herpes 4) Information pertaining to the law firms that interviewed Brittan Heller or Heide Iravani, and why such firms decided not to hire Brittan Heller and Heide Iravani 5) Information pertaining to whether Brittan Heller did indeed achieve a score of 159 on the LSAT 6) Information pertaining to Heide Iravani's religion - i.e., Islam - and information from any Muslim peers that may be able to shed any light on this case (this information may be a bit difficult to get, but local mosques would be a good place to send information requests or, if necessary, subpoenas) The above information requests and subpoenas wil be sent to YLS students, faculty, friends and family of Brittan Heller and Heide Iravani to the extent they are able to be located, as well as anyone else who knows Brittan Heller and Heide Iravani and would be able to provide such information. Whenever I make an information request, I will state exactly what the request is for, whom it concerns, and why I am seeking it. I will use Brittan Heller and Heide Iravani's true names, for without their true names, the information requests will be completely useless. As I stated above, my purpose here is not to hurt Brittan Heller or Heide Iravani; my purpose is to defend myself. However, I think it safe to say some of the information would be harmful to Brittan Heller and Heide Iravani. This brings to mind the unfortunate situation that Robert Steinbuch found himself in - i.e., having to deal with numerous embarrassing revelations - when he brought a defamation lawsuit against one Jessica Cutler not too long ago. The critical question, I think, for Brittan Heller and Heide Iravani to consider is whether having to deal with such a site and blog is wort "uncovering" the identity of a person who merely said that he thinks "Women named Jill and Heide should be raped." It is especially unfortunate that these words were the only negative words I ever wrote concerning either ¡DOE III or (DOE II . Again, I am not a lawyer, and due to my lack of legal expertise, these subpoenas and other discovery tools are the only things I believe I can do to defend myself against this lawsuit.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1630519&forum_id=2#19287295) |
Date: October 21st, 2011 2:51 PM
Author: Razzmatazz silver telephone bbw
Scott Walker once made a reply to a thread of mine that turned out to be so fucking credited in retrospect. It was a solid piece of advice that sticks to me this very day, and I respect him much for itUnfortunately, I don't have a link
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1630519&forum_id=2#19215926) |
Date: November 2nd, 2011 3:42 PM
Author: painfully honest foreskin stag film
god ive been searching for a post made a couple years back.it was about warcraft and how it ruins the lives of law students. it was truly amazing. got dozens of 180s.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1630519&forum_id=2#19286895) |
|
Date: November 3rd, 2011 7:42 PM
Author: misunderstood henna menage internal respiration
Holy hell. Back from the dead.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1630519&forum_id=2#19294457) |
|
No comments:
Post a Comment