Date: July 11th, 2020 6:22 PM
Author: Lionel Tiger (Test)
Doesn’t it equate to believing that stocks that have recently done poorly do better in the near future, on average, than stocks that have recently done well? I don’t know that I’d expect that to be the case.Seems like believing in buying the dips is falling victim to some kind of cognitive bias.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4582442&forum_id=2#40589514) |
   
Date: July 11th, 2020 6:24 PM
Author: [_____Sign Here____] (CiCiFrate // bump or post is not an endorsement)
Depends on the dip. When there is a big mkt decline, you can definitely upgrade in stock quality. If it is the company or sector only, it is more dangerous.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4582442&forum_id=2#40589523) |
Date: July 11th, 2020 6:28 PM
Author: Duck-like comical business firm dysfunction (exeunt / 0x6c542c3a976e324ccb84d594cbc084bd57597849)
it depends on the time horizon. there's a short-term mean reversion effect, where the worst monthly or weekly performers get a short-term pop, but the stocks that have done the best over a longer period (3 to 16 months) tend to continue to outperform.look at MTUM versus VLUE. MTUM has killed it.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4582442&forum_id=2#40589549) |
Elysia Mazurek
 |
Date: July 11th, 2020 6:36 PM
Author: We live in a clown world and I am a clown girl
MTUM has killed it recently, now go 5 years vs SPYIDK why anyone does anything other than 0 fee S&P ETF or something like VTI.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4582442&forum_id=2#40589587) |
|
Date: July 11th, 2020 6:37 PM
Author: Lionel Tiger (Test)
Nice moniker
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4582442&forum_id=2#40589593) |
|
No comments:
Post a Comment