NYT getting HAMMERED by commenters on Jeong issue

Date: August 10th, 2018 6:34 AM
Author: Miki Dora (old John L.)

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/09/opinion/sarah-jeong-tweets-opinion-section.html?WT.nav=opinion-c-col-left-region&action=click&clickSource=story-heading&module=opinion-c-col-left-region&pgtype=Homepage&region=opinion-c-col-left-region#commentsContainer

This is the first NYT article discussing Jeong with comments enabled. They are absolutely brutal. Maybe the NYT shouldn't have assumed their average lib reader thinks about race issues the same way as blue-haired twitter dykes?

Top five reader picks:


SMK NC
Charlotte, NCAug. 9
While I agree someone should be hired on the totality of their work, it’d be nice to see some evidence of self discipline on their part to refrain from tweeting anything and everything that comes to mind.

110,000 tweets? Did she ever think of something and NOT say it?

813 RecommendShare


Common Sense
NYCAug. 9
This author excuses the tweets as part of a body of work shared through Twitter that was poorly thought through, crafted in haste. Therefore the tweets don't count and this journalist must remain at the NYT. However what these tweets show is that this journalist consistently misused the tools of her craft - words and ideas - in a way that was shockingly immature. There's an old Sunday school lesson about gossiping and meanness: A pastor gives young children a tube of toothpaste and says squeeze. Then he says put the toothpaste back, which is clearly impossible. The lesson: Once words leave your mouth, or phone, they can't be taken back - they are permanent.

Respect your words. This journalist did not and should not remain at the NYT.

709 RecommendShare


Nancy
Great NeckAug. 9
Let he who is without a bad tweet cast the first stone.

[ Fine, then I will cast away.

The New York Times does not need to have a person who writes racist comments writing for the Times. ]

689 RecommendShare


James
St. Paul, MN.Aug. 9
Times Pick
My argument is a bit simpler. Of all the possible people to hire, I am certain that both the Atlantic and the New York Times could manage to find somebody who is both well qualified and does not have a record of hateful rhetoric. The search may have required just a bit more time and effort, but it would have been time and effort well spent.

675 RecommendShare

Anonymous
MassachusettsAug. 9
Times Pick
Of course the tweets don't reflect the "core truth of who she is". I"m sure she's lovely - and was undoubtedly provoked - but that's not the point. This wasn't one racist tweet, it was a pattern of behavior; a choice. It's unfathomable to me that the NYT would put her on the editorial board. I'm dismayed, and that's why I canceled my subscription.

660 RecommendShare

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4048074&forum_id=2#36590765)

psychotic Korean racist Sarah Jeong continued to 'believe' UVA rape accuser after

Date: August 7th, 2018 8:07 AM
Author: ,,,,,,^

she ADMITTED having lied about EVERYTHING she had claimed.

https://twitter.com/Steve_Sailer/status/1025529660900139008

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4044311&forum_id=2#36568252)

nyuug could you get Sarah Jeong to suck ur yellow monster & take it in her ass?

Date: August 2nd, 2018 8:21 PM
Author: Will Khitey



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4040796&forum_id=2#36543192)

The most amazing aspect of NYT/Sarah Jeong story is the fact that libs/NYT are

Date: August 2nd, 2018 2:51 PM
Author: ...,,....,,.,,,..,,,,...

so cocky. this is beyond spiking the football. this is spitting on your opponents face after spiking the football

but the weird thing is that the game is not over. sure you have a 18 pt lead at the start of 4th quarter but your opponents have Tom Brady (literally in this case) and 15 mins is more than enough time for them to pwn you especially when you look at their track record of dominating the game

So why are NYT libs (who are smart) doing this? If I was a NYT editor who is a true believer and wants to completely dismantle white power structure then I would have never hired this woman in the first place. I am pretty sure there are 100 other writers I could hire to write the same partisan BS without the damaging baggage. Why rile up and wake up your opponents? this makes no sense

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4040555&forum_id=2#36541329)

Is the Sarah Jeong story a big deal, a cultural watershed like Trayvon?

Date: August 2nd, 2018 3:11 PM
Author: THE AMAZON JUGGERNAUT



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4040566&forum_id=2#36541440)

Trump reads the tweets of Sarah Jeong at rally

Date: August 2nd, 2018 6:35 PM Author: libcrusher180 (reserved) (http://sarah-jeong.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=4040724&forum_id=2#36542656)

Date: August 2nd, 2018 6:35 PM Author: billable hour requirement (http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=4040724&forum_id=2#36542658)

Date: August 2nd, 2018 6:52 PM Author: Donald John Trump, Sr. "folks, remember the Mexican rapists? the famous rapists. i say some mexicans that are coming in are rapists, are bad hombres, and that's true, undeniable, and the media, the mainstream media, these lovely people back there *points* *crowd chants 'CNN sucks' for 3 minutes* ...oh boy, you guys are rough, rough stuff, how do you really feel huh? *chuckles and shakes head* Anyways so the famous rapists, *EXAGGERATED STIFF FORMAL VOICE* "Donald Trump said all Mexicans are rapists. Donald Trump said the Russians should hack the emails. Donald Trump Donald Trump* *BACK TO NORMAL TRUMP VOICE* ...right? Our fake news, our lovely fake news people, so they go bananas, they go bananas over my statement. But then this lady here, oh boy, I've got it right here *pulls several printed pages out of suit pocket* I've got it right here folks, oh boy, she's the newest hire for the New York Times. Listen, can you believe this? You're not gonna believe it. Sarah Jong, okay? Ms Jong, what does she say? Here's what she says on her tweets: 'Oh man, it's kind of sick how much joy I get out of being cruel to old white men' *crowd boos loudly* Can you imagine? I know, I know, terrible. Here's another one from Miss Jong: 'Are white people genetically predisposed to burn faster in the sun, thus logically being only fit to live underground like groveling goblins.' *BOOING INTENSIFIES* Amazing. New York Times Editorial board! *Trump waves papers* Was this her resume? Maybe it was her resume! I gotta read one more, okay, one more? Oh boy I can't even read this one, I see kids in the crowd folks, oh boy, well, I'll kinda reading it, okay? I'll kinda read it and you will get the idea. Not very presidential, but that's okay right? 'Dumbass....couldn't avoid that one, sorry, first word, don't know how else to say it....Dumbass f'n white people marking up the internet with their opinions...like dogs peeing and she didn't say peeing okay? but like dogs peeing on fire hydrants.' *BOOING INTENSIFIES FURTHER* It's a shame folks. And they complain when I call them the enemy of the people!" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4040724&forum_id=2#36542735)

Newest NYT Editorial Board member: KILL WHITEY!

Date: August 2nd, 2018 8:28 AM
Author: DrakeMallard (Let's get dangerous)

Bio:
https://twitter.com/sarahjeong

senior writer @verge // soon to be editorial board @nytimes. law and technology and stuff. sarah.jeong@ theverge .com

Old tweets:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DjluYczXcAAhMaQ.jpg

NYT editorial board announcement
https://www.nytco.com/sarah-jeong-joins-the-timess-editorial-board/



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4040281&forum_id=2#36539137)

Who is SARAH JEONG of Harvard Law School?

Date: August 9th, 2014 8:29 AM Author: "'""""'" http://twitter.com/sarahjeong/ (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2640130&forum_id=2#26091900)

Date: August 9th, 2014 8:31 AM Author: Carl 'The International Superstar' Froch 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2640130&forum_id=2#26091903)